I recently asked one of my Protestant friends: “What is your biggest obstacle to becoming Catholic?” He answered my provocative question with a well-stacked list of Catholic beliefs. He replied, “Well I’ve never really agreed with the doctrines of Purgatory, the Pope, praying to saints, the Eucharist, worshipping Mary…” Immediately, I thought of a thousand different ways to reply to his honest but equally ignorant response… Do Catholics really worship Mary? I answer yes and no.
If you have not yet discovered the genius of philosopher, Dr. Peter Kreeft, it’s time you do. Click on the following link to read a Boston College interview with one…
Read More An Interview With Dr. Peter Kreeft (And Some Book Recommendations)
From Steve Ray: “Recently I had a heated discussion about homosexuality with some good liberal friends. They contend that since homosexuality is seen among animals and since “God made people…
Moments before He died, our Lord uttered—apparently loud enough for the apostle John to hear—these three words: “It is finished” (John 19:13) But what exactly did He mean? Here is Dr.…
Many skeptics today claim that God is dead, buried by modern science and philosophy. But which God—or gods—have they buried?
In his published article Jesus And The Identity Of God, the eminent New Testament scholar and former Oxford chaplain, N.T. Wright, remembers how he would often meet with the new undergraduates to introduce himself and get acquainted. Naturally as chaplain he would inquire about their personal religious beliefs. Many were atheists. Wright recalls, “I developed a stock response: “Oh, that’s interesting; which god is it you don’t believe in?” Then after they stumbled out a few phrases in response the chaplain would reply, “Well, I’m not surprised you don’t believe in that god. I don’t believe in that god either.”
“What most people mean by ‘god’ in late-modern western culture”, writes Wright, “simply is not the mainstream Christian meaning.” Indeed this seems to be true; and not just among college undergraduates but even among some of the most prominent (and influential) atheists of today.
It should be an obvious fact that if an atheist really wants to defeat and discredit the notion of the Christian God, he has to address the Christian God; not some caricature of the real thing (not all atheists do this). The skeptic can take down as many distortions of the divine as he pleases; but if that’s all he’s taking out, then—whether he likes it or not—the God we are really defending will remain firmly standing without wound or blemish.
Christians, as a matter of orthodoxy, defend the Creator who is the self-existent, pure act of infinite being itself; and thus it is more precise to say, not that he exists, but that he is existence. But due to the finite limitations of human reason, it is more profitable (and more possible) for us to speak about what God is not; or to speak about this infinitely perfect Being by using analogy. Thus we might say that God who necessarily contains all perfections within himself is all-knowing, all-loving, all-present, and all-powerful (even though it is more precise to say that his infinite power is his infinite love which is his infinite knowledge, and so on).
All this is to say that God is the uncaused infinitely perfect act of being itself.
of the attributes that Christians believe God possesses is omnipotence. Omnipotent means “all-powerful.” Since we believe that God is all-powerful, atheists and agnostics will often throw up the following challenge:
“Since God is all-powerful could He create a rock (or whatever physical object they decide to insert here) that is too heavy for even Himself to lift?”
Read More Can God Create A Rock So Heavy That Not Even He Can Lift It?
No. Science can only prove or disprove the existence of physical things – that is, things made of matter that take up space. But angels are not physical beings, like humans; they are pure spirit.
At best, people who refuse to use any method except science to acquire knowledge must remain “agnostic” (or uncertain) about the existence of angels since science is incapable of answering such spiritual questions. In other words, there is an absence of scientific evidence for the existence of angels; but only because science cannot produce evidence for angels since angels are not physical beings.
Leave a Comment